It was somewhat disturbing to read in the Sunday New York Times about a new kind of service business: sorority coaches. These are women who get paid to help girls at college to pledge sororities. As part of their work, the coaches advise these young women on how to dress, shape their resume, and present themselves in order to maximize their chances of being asked to join a sorority.
As an adult long past this stage of life, I feel sympathy for young women who have to, or feel they have to, put so much effort into packaging themselves in a particular way to find a circle of friends at school. But what I found most disappointing in the article was its offhand discussion about weight and the necessity of losing weight before sorority rush. The author writes, “Many aspiring sisters spend their summer working out and dieting,” and cites a study that among girls in a normal weight range, the thinner ones are more likely to end up in a sorority. “It’s just you are being judged on how you look,” says one college student quoted in the story.
That the author and the participating girls just accept this without question or comment strikes me as sad. It also shows how ingrained in our culture it is that girls should strive to attain the a thin ideal. Given the pressure for conformity in sororities that this article describes (in many areas, not just weight), it is not at all surprising how prevalent body image concerns are among college women.
Showing posts with label college students. Show all posts
Showing posts with label college students. Show all posts
Sunday, July 22, 2012
Sunday, June 3, 2012
College Students and Prozac
What does it mean that there has been an explosion in the number of college students taking psychiatric medication? Does it mean that more students with mental illness are attending college? That people are more willing than in the past to seek treatment for anxiety and depression? That mental illness has been redefined? Or is it something else?
Katherine Sharpe -- a writer who discloses that she took antidepressants while attending college in the late 1990s -- makes a thoughtful attempt to answer these questions in the latest issue of the Chronicle of Higher Education. Facing increased stress, competition and pressure on campus, students feel the need to present themselves to others as being without flaws or weaknesses, writes Sharpe. Citing the research of Joseph Davis, a sociology professor at the University of Virginia, Sharpe says that students use medication to protect themselves from experiencing the emotions that they deem unacceptable -- emotions such as “discouragement and loneliness, nervousness and insecurity, jealousy and emotional vulnerability, shame and humiliation, shame and self-blame.” The desire to avoid such emotions diminishes, for these students, the appeal of traditional therapy, any form of which will require some exploration of the unpleasantness they feel. Medication, by contrast, can seem quicker and less painful.
What is going on, Sharpe writes, is a kind of “medicalization” of negative emotions -- a perception that if you experience these emotions, they must be connected to some kind of disorder. What can be lost is the opportunity to explore and reflect on normal negative emotions that may in fact have some significance and meaning. Overall, the emergence of effective psychiatric medications has enabled many students and non-students to thrive and few would argue with that. However, it is unfortunate if these medications also contribute to college students’ sense that they must achieve emotional perfection, and their mistaken belief that those around them have already achieved it. Much research shows that medication and psychotherapy can be more effective when used in tandem than either approach is when used by itself; it would be a shame if college students were to lose the added benefit of therapy because they want to avoid feelings of vulnerability.
Katherine Sharpe -- a writer who discloses that she took antidepressants while attending college in the late 1990s -- makes a thoughtful attempt to answer these questions in the latest issue of the Chronicle of Higher Education. Facing increased stress, competition and pressure on campus, students feel the need to present themselves to others as being without flaws or weaknesses, writes Sharpe. Citing the research of Joseph Davis, a sociology professor at the University of Virginia, Sharpe says that students use medication to protect themselves from experiencing the emotions that they deem unacceptable -- emotions such as “discouragement and loneliness, nervousness and insecurity, jealousy and emotional vulnerability, shame and humiliation, shame and self-blame.” The desire to avoid such emotions diminishes, for these students, the appeal of traditional therapy, any form of which will require some exploration of the unpleasantness they feel. Medication, by contrast, can seem quicker and less painful.
What is going on, Sharpe writes, is a kind of “medicalization” of negative emotions -- a perception that if you experience these emotions, they must be connected to some kind of disorder. What can be lost is the opportunity to explore and reflect on normal negative emotions that may in fact have some significance and meaning. Overall, the emergence of effective psychiatric medications has enabled many students and non-students to thrive and few would argue with that. However, it is unfortunate if these medications also contribute to college students’ sense that they must achieve emotional perfection, and their mistaken belief that those around them have already achieved it. Much research shows that medication and psychotherapy can be more effective when used in tandem than either approach is when used by itself; it would be a shame if college students were to lose the added benefit of therapy because they want to avoid feelings of vulnerability.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
